In developing strategic asset allocation, investors establish exposures to the asset classes agreed on their Investment Policy Statement (IPS); strategic asset allocation integrates investors’ financial objectives, risk tolerance, and investment constraints with their long-term capital market expectations. Strategic asset allocation is pivotal in executing investment plans.
Strategic asset allocation specifies an investor’s desired exposures to systematic risk since groups of assets of the same type are theoretically homogeneous which should reflect a certain set of systematic factors, and different groups of assets have different exposures to factors.
What affect the strategic asset allocation decision for individual investors? First, unlike tax-exempt institutions such like endowments, foundations, and pension plans, individual investors are taxable so they must consider the eventual tax consequences of the investible assets, the length of holding period, and focus on after-tax returns, as opposed to simply evaluating expected risk and return characteristics of investment alternatives. Taxation of capital gains and income introduces enormous complexity into individual investors’ investment planning and decisions.
In the United States, many individual investors seek to reduce the tax impact on investment returns utilizing tax-deferred investment vehicles, such as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), 401(k) accounts, 403(b) accounts, Keogh accounts, Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) accounts, and annuities.
Second, individual investors’ investment philosophy is rooted in the fact that they shoulder responsibility to fund a comfortable retirement. Across the board, the decline in employer-sponsored defined benefit plans and the resulting shift in accountability from employer to employee has led individual investors to pursue investment options that are more active while riskier. In fact, most individual investors lack the specialized knowledge necessary to succeed in today’s highly competitive investment markets. Less-than-appropriate asset-allocation guidelines have caused a list of investment errors and worse-than-expected investment results.
Considerations in Strategic Asset Allocation for Individual Investors
Strategic asset allocation for individual investors must account for the part of wealth flowing from current employment-based income to future sources of cash flows, and the changing mix of investment gains and employment-based income as individuals approach retirement. Beyond that, such strategic asset allocation must consider any correlation of employment-based income and investment returns. Furthermore, strategic asset allocation for individual investors should factor in the possibility of outliving their resources, a.k.a. longevity risk, to some extent, although longevity risk cannot be completely managed through asset allocation.
Earning ability is the major condition in determining an investor’s capacity for risk. Individuals with high earning ability can logically take more risk because they can more readily recover from any losses. An appropriate strategic asset allocation for individual investors must take their age and lifecycle into account, and such framework and the assumptions about their risk aversion must change with their lifecycle and the cash flow patterns of their income.
The book Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors by John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira makes three very important points, which have served as the foundation for many strategic asset allocation framework for individual investors:
- Investors with stable and predictable employment-based income will invest more of their financial assets into equity-oriented asset classes.
- Investors with employment-based income that is highly positively correlated with stock markets are better off choosing an asset allocation framework with less exposure to equity-oriented asset classes.
- An investor’s ability to adjust how long and how much he or she works tends to increase the optimal asset allocation to equity-oriented asset classes.
Everything else being equal, as an investor ages, the strategic allocation to equity-oriented assets should decrease. In the effort to implement the plan effectively, investment advisers should take the fiduciary to educate and assist their clients to adopt a life-cycle-related asset allocation strategy.
Moreover, in developing an appropriate strategic asset allocation, investors should determine whether their employment-based income is risk-free or risky, and whether the risk of this source of cash flow is significantly correlated with the stock market. If it has a high correlation with stock market returns, investors should reduce the exposure to risky assets and increase the allocation to the financial assets that are less correlated with the stock market.
It is worth noting that longevity risk is an important consideration in the asset-allocation decision for individual investors. Longevity risk is independent of financial market risk, and investors bear longevity risk directly. Unfortunately, longevity risk cannot be fully managed through asset allocation; an endeavor could be to take additional investment risk in order to earn higher long-term returns given the investor can take additional risk.
For investment advisers, when presenting strategic asset allocation recommendation to clients, it is essential to introduce all the options that are appropriate for the particular client, although most standard asset allocation templates only include stocks, bonds, and cash. Second, investment advisers should make sure that the asset classes they recommend are indeed best choices for the particular investor from the perspectives of tax efficiency and transaction costs. Finally, when choosing a time horizon for risk and return presentation, investment advisers should refer the respective client’s financial objectives and unique circumstances.
Behavioral Influences on Asset Allocation for Individual Investors
Behavioral finance asserts that most investors worry more about avoiding losses than acquiring gains. If the investor is loss averse, one approach may be to incorporate an appropriate shortfall risk constraint or objective in the asset-allocation decision. Managing assets with such a constraint or objective should reduce the chance that the client finds himself facing the prospect of a substantial loss.
If an investor displays mental accounting, he or she will look at the portfolio narrowly in pieces rather than as a whole, or separate the assets into separate accounts based on a series of subjective criteria. In addressing the issue of mental accounting, Brunel (2003) recommends an asset allocation framework for individual investors, which can be developed for four buckets: liquidity, income, capital preservation, and growth, and each bucket is adapted to the needs of the investor individually.
Such multi-strategy asset allocation is costly and more complex relative to the standard strategic asset allocation framework. Additionally, it involves multiple optimization processes. A major disadvantage of this approach is that it may potentially fail to deploy risk efficiently. If investors choose this strategy, investment advisers should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of it with their clients.
Besides, investors’ “regret avoidance” may also play a role in the implementation of strategic asset allocation. If an investor is highly sensitive to regret, he or she may show a strong favor to diversification. However, diversification in the upside is not ideal since it will ultimately lower the high-return potential. Under regret avoidance, the investor also tends to closely follow and ultimately adopt the average asset allocation of their peers, which may be inconsistent with his or her current financial situation, and therefore, result in inefficiency in strategic asset allocation.
Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors by John Y. Campbell and Luis M. Viceira April 2001
 Definition by Wikipedia.org: Mental accounting is a concept first named by Richard Thaler (1980) which attempts to describe the process whereby people code, categorize, and evaluate economic outcomes.